UAPA Bar: Bail Prevails

In cases involving Terrorist Activities, Bail Applications are governed by a delicate balance between the need to protect national security and the fundamental right to personal liberty. The Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed that the right to personal liberty and a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution is over-arching and sacrosanct, transcending the strictest statutory embargo.

Key Facts

• The case of Syed Iftikhar Andrabi Vs National Investigation Agency (Supreme Court of India) deals with the denial of bail to an accused charged under various provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA), the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).
• The appellant had been in custody since 11 June 2020 and argued that prolonged incarceration and delay in trial violated his fundamental right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.
• The Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 43D(5) of the UAPA and the statutory restrictions on grant of bail under special enactments.
• The Court reiterated that constitutional courts retain the power to grant bail where prolonged incarceration and delay in trial infringe Article 21, notwithstanding statutory embargoes under the UAPA or NDPS Act.

Statutory Context & Tax Analysis

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) is a special law that deals with terrorist activities and imposes stringent conditions for grant of bail. Section 43D(5) of the UAPA states that no person accused of an offence punishable under Chapters IV and VI of the Act shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity of being heard on the application for such release. The proviso to this section states that the accused shall not be released on bail if the Court is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against such person is prima facie true.

The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) also imposes stringent conditions for grant of bail. Section 37 of the NDPS Act states that no person accused of an offence under the Act shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity of being heard on the application for such release. The section also states that the Court shall not release the accused on bail if it is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

Client Impact & Compliance Procedure

In light of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Syed Iftikhar Andrabi, it is clear that the right to personal liberty and a speedy trial is a fundamental right that cannot be denied to an accused person, even in cases involving terrorist activities. The Court has emphasized that the statutory restrictions on grant of bail under special enactments like the UAPA and NDPS Act cannot override the constitutional right to personal liberty and a speedy trial.

To comply with the judgment, the following steps can be taken:

1. File a bail application: If an accused person has been in custody for a prolonged period and the trial is likely to be delayed, a bail application can be filed before the Court.
2. Argue for speedy trial: The accused person can argue that the delay in trial is a violation of their fundamental right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.
3. Challenge statutory restrictions: The accused person can challenge the statutory restrictions on grant of bail under special enactments like the UAPA and NDPS Act, arguing that they violate the constitutional right to personal liberty and a speedy trial.
4. Seek interim relief: The accused person can seek interim relief, such as interim bail, to protect their fundamental rights pending the trial.

Forms to file:

• Bail application under Section 437 or 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
• Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for enforcement of fundamental rights
• Application for interim relief under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Records to maintain:

• Copy of the bail application and supporting documents
• Copy of the order of the Court granting or rejecting bail
• Copy of the petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and supporting documents
• Copy of the application for interim relief and supporting documents

Reference: Click here to view the official source