Penny Stock Loss Addition Disallowed Without Manipulation Evidence

The case of ITO Vs Mayukh Construction Private Limited (ITAT Kolkata) highlights the importance of Stock Manipulation and Loss Disallowance in the context of income tax assessments, where the Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleting an addition of Rs.72,28,366 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of alleged bogus loss arising from transactions in shares of India Infotech and Software Ltd. This decision underscores the need for taxpayers to maintain meticulous records and provide comprehensive documentation to support their claims, particularly in cases involving penny stock transactions, to avoid loss disallowance due to suspected stock manipulation.

Key Facts

• Date of order: 06.04.2026
• Assessment Year: 2014-15
• Section 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Reopening of assessment
• Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Notice to Bombay Stock Exchange
• Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
• Appeal No. 950 of 2022: Order of Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) in the case of Infotech India & Software Ltd. Vs. Security & Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
• Penalty under Section 23E of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956: Imposed by SEBI and reduced by SAT
• Relevant case laws: Braten Mandal v. ITO, Gateway Financial Services Ltd. v. ACIT, PCIT v. Sangitaben Jagdishkumar Shah, PCIT v. Genuine Finance Pvt Ltd

Statutory Context & Tax Analysis

The Income Tax Act, 1961, provides for the reopening of assessments under Section 147 if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. In this case, the assessment was reopened under Section 147 and 148 after the AO received information that the assessee was allegedly a beneficiary of accommodation entries in the form of bogus long-term capital loss involving penny stock transactions in India Infotech and Software Ltd. The AO treated the company as a manipulated penny stock and concluded that the assessee had claimed a bogus loss of Rs.72,28,366 from the sale of the shares. However, the ITAT relied on the findings of the SAT, which observed that investigations did not establish diversion or misappropriation of funds, manipulation in the price of the scrip, disproportionate gain, or unfair advantage to any person. The ITAT also noted that the Bombay Stock Exchange had independently confirmed the transactions in response to the AO’s notice under Section 133(6). The Tribunal’s decision highlights the importance of considering the evidence on record and the findings of other regulatory bodies, such as the SAT, in determining the genuineness of transactions.

Client Impact & Compliance Procedure

To avoid loss disallowance due to suspected stock manipulation, taxpayers should maintain meticulous records and provide comprehensive documentation to support their claims, particularly in cases involving penny stock transactions. This includes:

1. Maintaining contract notes, broker statements, demat records, and bank statements to support the genuineness of transactions.
2. Ensuring that all transactions are carried out through recognized stock brokers and exchanges.
3. Providing evidence of the purchase and sale of shares, including copies of purchase and sale ledgers, contract notes, and bank statements.
4. Filing all relevant documents and evidence with the AO and appellate authorities.
5. Ensuring that the taxpayer is a regular participant in share trading and has a genuine intention to buy and sell shares.
6. Maintaining a demat account and ensuring that all transactions are reflected in the demat account statement.
7. Filing returns of income and responding to notices issued by the AO in a timely manner.
8. Maintaining records of all communications with the AO, including notices, questionnaires, and responses.
9. Filing appeals with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the ITAT, as necessary.
10. Ensuring compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, including the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, and the SEBI regulations. By following these steps, taxpayers can minimize the risk of loss disallowance due to suspected stock manipulation and ensure that their claims are supported by robust documentation and evidence. Additionally, taxpayers should be aware of the relevant case laws and regulatory developments, such as the decisions of the ITAT and the SAT, to ensure that they are in compliance with the latest regulatory requirements.

Reference: Click here to view the official source