The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal by quashing the reassessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 2012-13 due to the non-issuance of a mandatory notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after the assessee filed a return in response to a notice under section 148, even though the return was filed belatedly. This decision is based on the principle that the issuance of a notice under section 143(2) is a jurisdictional and mandatory requirement once a return is filed pursuant to section 148, irrespective of whether such return is filed within or beyond the specified time.
Key Facts
- The Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148 on 25.03.2019.
- The assessee filed the return on 11.12.2019 in response to the notice under section 148.
- The assessment was completed on 20.12.2019 without issuing any notice under section 143(2).
- The CIT(A)/NFAC upheld the reassessment by invoking section 292BB.
- The ITAT relied on decisions of the Delhi High Court and Patna High Court to hold that the issuance of notice under section 143(2) is mandatory.
- Relevant sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961, include sections 143(2), 148, and 292BB.
Tax Analysis
The ITAT’s decision is based on a deep analysis of the Income Tax Act, 1961, particularly sections 143(2) and 148. The Tribunal noted that the issuance of a notice under section 143(2) is a jurisdictional requirement that cannot be dispensed with, even if the return is filed belatedly in response to a notice under section 148. The Tribunal rejected the application of section 292BB, which deals with the service of notice, stating that it cannot cure the complete absence of a statutory notice. This decision aligns with the principles established by the Delhi High Court and Patna High Court, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the notice under section 143(2) for the validity of reassessment proceedings.
Client Impact
This decision has significant implications for taxpayers who have filed returns in response to notices under section 148, even if such returns are filed belatedly. It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that all procedural requirements, including the issuance of a notice under section 143(2), are strictly followed by the Assessing Officer. Taxpayers should be aware of their rights and the mandatory requirements that must be fulfilled by the tax authorities to ensure the validity of reassessment proceedings. In cases where a notice under section 143(2) has not been issued after filing a return in response to a section 148 notice, taxpayers may challenge the reassessment on this legal ground, potentially leading to the quashing of the reassessment proceedings. It is advisable for taxpayers to seek professional advice to navigate such situations and ensure compliance with all legal requirements.
Reference: Click here to view the official source
